Louisville, KY, March 12, 2004 – Investigators from the U.S. Chemical Safety and
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) said the April 11, 2003, explosion
and resulting ammonia release at the D.D. Williamson and Co. plant in
Louisville were caused by over-pressurization of an eight-foot-tall
food additive processing tank. The CSB said the accident could have
been prevented had the company installed an emergency pressure relief
valve on the tank. The CSB also noted that the tank that exploded had
a history of prior damage.
The explosion took the life of an employee who had
worked for five years at the plant. It caused extensive damage to the
facility, which makes caramel coloring for use in food products such
as soft drinks. The explosion, which occurred around 2:10 a.m., blew
the top of the tank some 100 yards to the west. The tank shell struck
a nearby ammonia tank, knocking it off its foundation. This resulted
in the release of an estimated 26,000 pounds of aqua ammonia (ammonia
gas in a water solution) over a five-hour period, forcing the evacuation
of 26 residents and requiring 1500 others to remain sheltered in their
homes.
Investigators presented the findings at a public meeting today in Louisville,
during which Board members were scheduled to vote on the report and
its safety recommendations. The Lead CSB investigator said, "The
accident was avoidable. In the 1980s, the company shipped two used tanks,
including the one that exploded, from out of state to the Louisville
facility. The tanks had not been inspected, certified, or registered
as pressure vessels prior to bringing them into Kentucky — a requirement
of the state's Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Act."
The Lead CSB investigator also said the company routinely heated liquid
caramel in the vessels to 160°F and then used compressed air to
help push the caramel out to a dryer. He said, "Since the vessels
were operated above pressures of 15 pounds per square inch, the company
should have classified these tanks as pressure vessels as required by
law. The tanks should have been equipped with emergency pressure relief
valves, pressure and temperature alarms, and automatic systems to shut
down the process in case of over-pressurization. In the absence of these
safety measures, operators had to rely on visual inspection of temperature
and pressure gauges to keep the process under control."
Investigators determined that on the night of the incident, two workers,
who were brothers, filled the tank with liquid caramel and turned on
the heating steam to the vessel. Meanwhile, they were occupied in another
room re-labeling some product boxes that had been mislabeled. Returning
later to the tank room, the second operator noticed that the caramel
was leaking from the top of the vessel and called in the lead operator.
A metal insulation band snapped in two as the tank expanded under the
increasing temperature and pressure inside. The lead operator then sent
his brother to locate a mechanic. Moments later the vessel exploded,
killing the lead operator.
Investigators said the lead operator likely had attempted to open the
tank's air vent to release the excess pressure. But the vent was not
designed for emergency pressure relief and was not adequately sized
for the vessel. In any event, investigators later found that the vent
pipe had clogged with solidified caramel product.
The CSB concluded that it was "improbable" — based on the
temperature of the heating steam — that the pressure inside the tank
ever exceeded 130 pounds per square inch (psi). Drawings show that the
tank was built with a maximum working pressure of 40 psi, and CSB investigators
estimated that the tank, as originally designed, was probably capable
of withstanding pressure up to 180 psi. Therefore, the CSB said, the
"more likely cause of failure" was that the tank had been
weakened sometime earlier. The report noted that the tank had been deformed
on two occasions prior to being installed in Louisville when it was
subjected to excessive vacuum, and was subsequently repaired. The repairs
were not inspected or certified.
The CSB Board Chairman said, "The tragedy that befell this worker
is another example of why plant owners and managers must have effective
engineering oversight and hazard analysis systems in place. They should
be regularly analyzing various scenarios that could lead to accidents
and put into place safety systems that result in extra layers of protection."
Investigators cited several root causes, noting that the feed tanks
were installed without a review of their design or fitness for service.
Investigators concluded that D.D. Williamson and Co. did not have effective
programs to determine if equipment and processes met basic engineering
requirements. The company also lacked effective systems for assessing
the hazards of its processes.
Finally, the company did not instruct workers on the hazards of overheating
or over-pressurizing the caramel vessels. CSB investigators proposed
several recommendations be issued to the D.D. Williamson and Co. examine
all vessels at company facilities and ensure that each pressure vessel
has adequate pressure relief systems and alarms. The CSB also recommended
the company upgrade operating procedures, train its operators, and implement
a hazard evaluation procedure to determine the potential for catastrophic
accidents. The CSB recommended that the Kentucky state government inform
pressure vessel owners, mechanical contractors, engineering companies,
and insurers that used pressure vessels must be inspected and registered
before being placed in service in Kentucky. |